Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

84 Ohio St. 3d 17

State v. Lance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-11-25

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2007

3 state decisions

Relies on State v. Cook

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-11-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The judgment of the court of appeals on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

¶2*18Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V are dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in part and dissent in part.
Cook, J.,

¶3concurring in part and dissenting in part. I dissent from the dismissal of Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.
/84/ohiost3d/17 · .json · Public domain