Tarwater v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1988
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It told the jurors that they should consider the lesser-included offense only if they did not find petitioner guilty of the first degree offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. The court erred in giving that instruction, because it required the jury to reach a verdict on the offenses charged before considering any lesser included offenses. State v. Martin, 64 Or App 469, 471 , 668 P2d 479 (1983); State v. Ogden, supra . (Emphasis in original)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tarwater v. Cupp“reversed and remanded with instructions to order new trial on rape and sodomy counts only; minimum sentence vacated; [6] [and] otherwise affirmed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tarwater v. Cupp“petitioner's minimum sentence must be vacated, because it was based in part on the sentences imposed for the rape and sodomy convictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tarwater v. Cupp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.