Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 ORAPP 233 - Tarwater v. Cupp

Tarwater v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It told the jurors that they should consider the lesser-included offense only if they did not find petitioner guilty of the first degree offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. The court erred in giving that instruction, because it required the jury to reach a verdict on the offenses charged before considering any lesser included offenses. State v. Martin, 64 Or App 469, 471 , 668 P2d 479 (1983); State v. Ogden, supra . (Emphasis in original)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reversed and remanded with instructions to order new trial on rape and sodomy counts only; minimum sentence vacated; [6] [and] otherwise affirmed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “petitioner's minimum sentence must be vacated, because it was based in part on the sentences imposed for the rape and sodomy convictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.