84 Or. App. 376 - State v. Langevin’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1988
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · United States v. Robinson · Gustafson v. Florida · State v. Owens · State v. Caraher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"* * * A police officer may obtain a chemical test of the blood to determine the amount of alcohol in any person's blood * * * as provided in the following: "(1) If, when requested by a police officer, the person expressly consents to such a test. "(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, from a person without the person's consent if: "(a) The police officer has probable cause to believe that the person was driving while under the influence of intoxicants and that evidence of the offense will be found in the person's blood or urine; and "(b) The person is unconscious or otherwise in a condition rendering the person incapable of expressly consenting to the test or tests requested."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Milligan“`Arrest' means to place a person under actual or constructive restraint or to take a person into custody for the purpose of charging that person with an offense. A `stop' as authorized under ORS 131.605 to 131.625 is not an arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Milligan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.