Keller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Peterson v. State · Amidon v. State · Peterkin v. State · Burks v. State · DeMille v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a judge's duty of recusal encompasses not only those cases in which the judge actually can not be fair and unbiased, but also those cases in which the judge's participation would lead reasonable people to question the fairness of the proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillips v. State“[alny judge, but especially judges in smaller communities, will from time to time be assigned to a case which involves people whom the judge knows.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillips v. State“[any] proceeding in which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crawford v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.