State v. Markland’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Arvizu · State v. Pena · United States of America v. Dallas Williams · State v. Deitman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a) [Deputy Spotten] received a report that someone was crying for help five minutes earlier in the area where he found [Mark-land], b) It was late at night and the area was not well lit. c) [Markland] was headed down a dead-end road where he could not get anywhere. d) [Markland] said he was going home to a location that he could not get to by traveling in the direction in which he was headed. e) [Markland] was carrying two bags with him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Markland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.