Williams v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 167 Cal. App. 2d 391 - Laddon v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO · 178 Cal. App. 2d 680 - Pettie v. Superior Court · 257 Cal. App. 2d 825 - Doak v. Superior Court of L.A Cty. · 19 Utah 2d 189 - Ellis v. Gilbert · Bean v. Best
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not ground for objection that the testimony will be inadmissible at the trial if the testimony sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weisbeck v. Hess“to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.