Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 S.D. 177 - State v. Brech

State v. Brech’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

2 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 1993 · most notably Nachtigall v. Erickson (1970), Crowe v. State (1972)

2 district · 26 state decisions

2101969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Townsend v. Sain · Jackson v. Denno · McCarthy v. United States · Williams v. People of State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We find no merit in petitioner's assertion his plea failed to comply with section 777.12. He acknowledged in open court while assisted by counsel that he knowingly and intelligently signed the written plea. He at no time voiced disapproval or dissatisfaction with the plea. He waived time for pronouncement of sentence which was then imposed. Such an acknowledgment in open court in the presence of his attorney is tantamount to an open court plea as required by section 777.12. Minor deviations from statutory procedure do not amount to a denial of due process entitling petitioner to relief in a collateral proceeding such as habeas corpus." Parrott v. Haugh, 158 N.W.2d 766 (Iowa 1966).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"The Court: * * * Now, Mr. Brech, included within the crime of murder is a lesser crime known as manslaughter in the first degree. I'll ask you now, are you guilty or not guilty of manslaughter in the first degree? You have to answer that. "Defendant: Yes. "The Court: You're guilty of manslaughter in the first degree—enter his plea of guilty to manslaughter in the first degree." State v. Brech, supra, 169 N.W.2d 242 , footnote 1, 247, 248.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Homicide is the killing of one human being by another. It is either: (1) Murder; (2) Manslaughter; (3) Excusable 'homicide; or, Justifiable homicide.” SDCL 22-16-1. “Homicide is manslaughter in the first degree when perpetrated without a design to effect death and in a heat of passion * * * by means of a dangerous weapon; unless it is committed under such circumstances as constitute excusable or justifiable homicide.” SDCL 22-16-16.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.