Broussard v. Broussard’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 59 So. 2d 732 - Elba v. Thomas · State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. v. Koval · Levy v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America · 7 So. 2d 757 - Lindsey v. Gulf Ins. Co. · 11 So. 2d 52 - Scarborough v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The court must be alert to protect insurers in circumstances where close family relationship or association tend to ally the sympathy of the insured with those to whom the insurer may be liable; and, normally, in evaluating credibility such factors are properly taken into account." 84 So.2d 903 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The insured shall cooperate with the company, and upon the company's request shall attend hearings and trials and shall assist in effecting settlements, securing and giving evidence, obtaining the attendance of witnesses and in the conduct of suits * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.