Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 So. 3d 180 - Hildwin v. State

84 So. 3d 180 - Hildwin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Williams v. Taylor · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret · Simmons v. South Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Penalty phase prejudice under the Strickland standard is measured by whether the error of trial counsel undermines this Court’s confidence in the sentence of death when viewed in the context of the penalty phase evidence and the mitigators and aggravators found by the trial court.” Stewart v. State, 37 So.3d 248, 258 (Fla.2010) (quoting Hurst v. State, 18 So.3d 975, 1013 (Fla.2009)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.