Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 So. 3d 722 - State v. Duke

84 So. 3d 722 - State v. Duke’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Bearden v. Georgia · Turner v. Louisiana · Chambers v. Florida · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An indigent person may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence.” Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 , 103 S.Ct. 2064 , 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.