84 So. 3d 836 - Gary v. Gary’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reddell v. Reddell · Perkins v. Perkins · 824 So. 2d 604 - Dennis v. Dennis · Townsend v. Townsend · 803 So. 2d 1168 - McBride v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failure to file a brief is tantamount to a confession of error, there is an exception when this court can 'state with conviction after reviewing the record and brief of the appealing party that no error existed.' ” Gary v. Gary, 84 So.3d 836, 838-39 (¶ 11) (Miss.Ct.App.2012) (quoting Conservator of Eldridge v. Sparkman, 813 So.2d 753, 755 (¶ 7) (Miss.Ct.App.2001)). After a review of the record, we find that there is a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harmon v. Harmon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.