Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 TENN 461 - Cook v. State

Cook v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1886

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 1991
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1991

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

90188618901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The recent possession of stolen property may sometime be referable, not to the crime of theft, but to another-, though kindred offense, that of having received the property with a guilty knowledge of its having been stolen. And in the opinion of an able writer, there can be little doubt that persons have been frequently convicted and punished for the former offense whose guilt consisted in the latter.’ ” Id. at 464-465 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In cases of his kind, where the party is found in possession of stolen property, and the proof shows his possession to have been a guilty possession, slight circumstances may authorize a jury to determine whether he has been guilty of the theft, or of receiving the property, knowing it to have been stolen.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.