Marin v. Lalley’s Empirical Analysis
84 U.S. 14 · 1872
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Hewitt v. United States (1940), Edmund Smiley v. State of Kansas (1905)
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bronson v. Railroad Co. · Levy v. Gadsby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If there were any doubt as to the finality of the original order, there can be none that it became final when the answer and objections were overruled. That order seems to have been made contradictorily with the debtors. Their opposition was overruled, and their property decreed to be seized and sold to pay their debts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the order . for executory process,' entered herein on the 28th day of March, 1872, and made final on the 3d day of'June, 1872, by judg ment of this honorable court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is in substance a decree of foreclosure and sale, which has repeatedly been held to be a final decree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.