Moore v. Duke’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Suburban Propane Division of National Distillers and Chemical Corp v. Proctor Gas Inc (1992), Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux. (1925)
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lake Shore Ry Co v. Prentice · District of Columbia v. Woodbury · 16 E.H. Smith 154 - Krug v. . Pitass · Chandler v. Spear · Earl v. Tupper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“those so small in amount as to show that they are not intended as any equivalent or satisfaction to the party recovering them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“exemplary damages are allowed in enhancement merely of ordinary damages”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“must elect against which party he will seek aggravated damages,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.