Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 Wash. 2d 380 - Bare v. Gorton

84 Wash. 2d 380 - Bare v. Gorton’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
5
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably 97 Wash. 2d 317 - Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. Sellers (1982), 92 Wash. 2d 905 - Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. City of Seattle (1979)

29 state decisions

10019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griswold v. State of Connecticut · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY · Baggett v. Bullitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]ho decides and what standards are to be used in determining whether a particular communication is for or against a proposition? Imagine an avdertisement [sic] which states "If you believe you should raise your taxes for a teacher salary increase, vote for the special levy." The act provides no standards to determine how to allocate the cost of that message as for or against the proposition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[F]reedom of speech and press involve more than the bare right to speak and publish. To say otherwise is to ignore reality. To communicate effectively with the mass of voters, one cannot be limited to verbal communication, person-to-person, but must use the media in one form or another. The protected rights include dissemination, distribution and the correlative rights of the public to receive such expressions of opinion. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 , 23 L.Ed.2d 371 , 89 S.Ct. 1794 (1969).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““An administrative body does not have authority to determine the constitutionality of the law it administers; only the courts have that power. United States v. Kissinger, 250 F.2d 940 (3 Cir.1958); cert. denied, 356 U.S. 958 , 78 S.Ct. 995 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1958). 3 K. Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 20.04 at 74 (1958).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.