84 Wash. 2d 48 - State v. LeRoy’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1999
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 20 Wash. 2d 740 - Tucker v. Brown · Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co. · 69 Wash. 2d 256 - State v. Whitney · 25 Wash. 2d 291 - Larson v. City of Seattle · State v. Studer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While CrR 3.3 [an older version] does not specifically exclude the time on appeal from the computation of the time allowed for a speedy trial, it is apparent that it must be excluded. The superior court loses jurisdiction when a notice of appeal is filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. WHELECHEL“the superior court cannot try a defendant and consequently the time limitations of CrR 3.3 cannot be invoked to demand trial while the appeal is pending.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. WHELECHEL
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.