84 Wash. 2d 657 - State v. Hynds’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78O (§ 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · 27 Wash. 2d 336 - State v. Britton · 38 Wash. 2d 593 - State v. Wilson · 55 Wash. 2d 58 - Chase v. Beard · Kistner v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The instructions do not leave the impression that mere suspicious circumstances, use of high pressure tactics or the fact that the defendants might have known the facts indicating the falsity of the representation would be sufficient circumstantial evidence to warrant a conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.