84 Wash. 2d 874 - Blondheim v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 106 Wash. 2d 1 - Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co. (1986), City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board (1998)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Grayned v. City of Rockford · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Vagueness" goes to the question of procedural due process, i.e., whether a statute provides fair notice, measured by common practice and understanding, of that conduct which is prohibited and whether there are proper standards for adjudication.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“In the past, infringement of a specific legal right or interest was required for standing. However, in recent years there has been a trend to permit a broader view of factual interests that will give rise to standing. . . . The "legal interest" test goes to the merits. The question of standing is different. It concerns, apart from the "case" or "controversy" test, the question whether the interest sought to be protected by the complainant is arguably within the zone of interests to be protected or regulated by the statute or constitutional guarantee in question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“For the purpose of this chapter the words “dependent child” shall mean any child under the age of eighteen years: (7) Who is incorrigible; that is, who is beyond the control and power of his parents, guardian, or custodian by reason of the conduct or nature of said child; . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.