84 Wash. App. 166 - State v. Dana’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(l)(a) Orders, lures, or attempts to lure a minor or a person with a developmental disability into any area or structure that is obscured from or inaccessible to the public, or away from any area or structure constituting a bus terminal, airport terminal, or other transportation terminal, or into a motor vehicle; (b) Does not have the consent of the minor’s parent or guardian or of the guardian of the person with a developmental disability; and (c) Is unknown to the child or developmentally disabled person. (2) It is a defense to luring, which the defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant’s actions were reasonable under the circumstances and the defendant did not have any intent to harm the health, safety, or welfare of the minor or the person with the developmental disability.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 181 Wash. 2d 102 - State v. Homan

2. “[T]he connotation of the word `lure' amplifies that meaning by implying that one who lures another leads that person into a course of action that is wrong or foolish under the circumstances.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. McReynolds

3. “(1)(a) Orders, lures, or attempts to lure a minor . . . into a motor vehicle; (b) Does not have the consent of the minor's parent or guardian . . .; and (c) Is unknown to the child.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. McReynolds