State v. Esters’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2010
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Robinett v. United States · State v. Pirtle · 105 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Bergeron · 125 Wash. 2d 707 - State v. Byrd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“recklessly when he knows of and disregards a substantial risk that a wrongful act may occur and his disregard of such substantial risk is a gross deviation from conduct that a reasonable man would exercise in the same situation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Esters“in WPIC 35.50. Note on Use, WPIC 35.50, at 453 (2d ed. 1994) (first paragraph to be used in battery cases). [2] We have defined common law battery as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Esters“[i]ntentionally assaults another and thereby recklessly inflicts substantial bodily harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Esters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.