Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 Wash. App. 379 - State v. Reed

84 Wash. App. 379 - State v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably State v. Anderson (2000), 88 Wash. App. 719 - State v. Semakula (1997)

48 state decisions

380199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5841 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Staples v. United States · Yamanis v. United States · 101 Wash. 2d 481 - State v. Gore · 122 Wash. 2d 553 - State v. Shawn P. · United States v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person, whether an adult or juvenile, is guilty of the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm in the first degree, if the person owns, has in his or her possession, or has in his or her control any firearm after having previously been convicted in this state or elsewhere of any serious offense as defined in this chapter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Knowledge that possession is unlawful is not an element of the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm nor does good faith belief that a certain activity does not violate the law provide a defense in a criminal prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The existence of a constitutionally valid prior conviction is an essential element of the offense, one the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.