84 Wash. App. 523 - State v. Padilla’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 111 Wash. 2d 353 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Williams · 125 Wash. 2d 919 - State v. Ford · 2 Wash. App. 241 - State v. Tate · 29 Wash. App. 842 - State v. Duhaime · 46 Wash. App. 461 - State v. Netling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]henever a defendant shall be acquitted or convicted upon an indictment or information charging a crime consisting of different degrees, he cannot be proceeded against or tried for the same crime in another degree, nor for an attempt to commit such crime, or any degree thereof,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ahluwalia“bars successive prosecutions for different degrees of the same crime but does not apply to lesser included offenses”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ahluwalia“RCW 10.43.050 bars trial only following a conviction or acquittal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ahluwalia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.