State v. Hickman’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · Kirk v. State · 114 Wash. 2d 59 - State v. Fowler · 123 Wash. 2d 467 - State v. Dent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To convict the defendant of the crime of Insurance Fraud, each of the following elements of the crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) That the defendant, James Hickman, on or about the 1st day of July, 1992, to the 31st of August, 1992, did knowingly present or cause to be presented a false or fraudulent claim or any proof in support of such a claim, for the payment of a loss under a contract of insurance; and (2) That the false or fraudulent claim was made in the excess of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500); and (3) That the act occurred in Snohomish County, Washington. CP at 33 (Instruction No. 6) (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hickman“knowingly present or cause to be presented a false or fraudulent claim....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hickman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.