84 Wash. App. 677 - State v. McKinley’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably 88 Wash. App. 719 - State v. Semakula (1997), State v. JH (1999)
2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 116 Wash. 2d 342 - Rozner v. City of Bellevue · 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 109 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Schaaf · 118 Wash. 2d 498 - Tomlinson v. Clarke · 39 Wash. App. 609 - Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Human Rights Commission Hearing Tribunal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person, whether an adult or juvenile, is guilty of the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree, if the person ... owns, has in his or her possession, or has in his or her control any firearm: ... If the person is under eighteen years of age....” RCW § 9.41.040(2)(a). 2 . Section 922(g)(1) provides in relevant part:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A person, whether an adult or juvenile, is guilty of the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm in the first degree, if the person owns, has in his or her possession, or has in his or her control any firearm after having previously been convicted in this state or elsewhere of any serious offense as defined in this chapter!.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an amendment clarifies existing law and where that amendment does not contravene previous constructions of the law, the amendment may be deemed curative, remedial and retroactive. This is particularly so where an amendment is enacted during a controversy regarding the meaning of the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cannon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.