State v. J.W.’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 121 Wash. 2d 707 - State v. Mail · 119 Wash. 2d 572 - State v. Onefrey · 55 Wash. App. 13 - State v. Hays · 60 Wash. App. 529 - State v. Ziegler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“he cautiously recommended a special sex offender disposition alternative [1] (SSODA) term with ten specific conditions. The primary conditions were placement with his current foster parents and sex offender treatment by certified providers; constant supervision, including a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. JW“over the case. The judge stated her first concern was that DeWaelsche, who originally recommended the SSODA, considered J.W. a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. JW“to his personality that would sometimes take over, that he could be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. JW
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.