84 Wis. 2d 145 - McClelland v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 124 Wis. 2d 681 - State v. Wyss (1985), 127 Wis. 2d 247 - State v. Fishnick (1985)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. New York · Walder v. United States · Oregon v. Hass · 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 34 Wis. 2d 278 - Whitty v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““904.03 Exclusion of relevant evidence on grounds of prejudice, confusion, or waste of time. Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“an offer of proof must be made in the trial court as a condition precedent to the review of any alleged error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the defendant intends to rely upon an alibi as a defense, the defendant shall give notice to the district attorney at the arraignment or at least 30 days before trial stating particularly the place where the defendant claims to have been when the crime is alleged to have been committed together with the names and addresses of witnesses to the alibi, if known. If at the close of the [Sjtate's case the defendant withdraws the alibi or if at the close of the defendant's case the defendant does not call some or any of the alibi witnesses, the [SJtate shall not comment on the defendant's withdrawal or on the failure to call some or any of the alibi witnesses. The [S]tate shall not call any alibi witnesses not called by the defendant for the purpose of impeaching the defendant's credibility with regard to the alibi notice. Nothing in this section may prohibit the [Sjtate from calling said alibi witnesses for any other purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Saunders
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.