Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 84 Wis. 2d 348 - Candee v. Egan

84 Wis. 2d 348 - Candee v. Egan’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably 103 Wis. 2d 56 - Kranzush v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co. (1981), 47 Wis. 2d 171 - Mortgage Associates, Inc. v. Monona Shores, Inc. (1970)

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

12019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harrigan v. Gilchrist · 83 Wis. 2d 40 - Arsand v. City of Franklin · 56 Wis. 2d 222 - Rose v. Schantz · 69 Wis. 2d 119 - De Bauche v. Knott · Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. Marlow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A receiver in aid of execution is authorized to collect those assets revealed by the examination of the debtor, take possession of them, apply them to the satisfaction of the judgment, and return the excess to the judgment debtor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] judgment creditor who first begins supplementary proceedings against a particular judgment debtor obtains an equitable lien upon the debtor's nonexempt property that is prior to the equitable lien of a judgment creditor who commences a supplementary proceeding thereafter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “although a receiver is typically authorized by his [or her] order of appointment to take control of all of the judgment debtor's nonexempt property, [the receiver] need actually do so only to the extent necessary to satisfy the claims of the judgment creditors . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.