Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

840 F.2d 12

Docket No. 87-6512.

Workman v. Holland

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Aug. 28, 1987. Decided: Feb. 8, 1988.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-02-08

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Richard Edward Wiggins v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General of Virginia Ellis B. Wright, Jr., Warden

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1988-02-08

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Elmer Roger Workman, appellant pro se.

Catherine Anne McMullen, Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Workman v. Holland, C/A No. 84-3114 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 19, 1986). Workman's motion to appoint counsel is denied.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/840/f2d/12 · .json · Public domain