Chicago Milwaukee St Paul and Pacific Railroad Co Stickney Corporation v. Chicago Milwaukee Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
840 F.2d 1308 · 1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2012
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert · Wolf v. Weinstein · In re Nucorp Energy, Inc. · Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. Lane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.