Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 840 F.2d 132 - Johnson v. General Electric

Johnson v. General Electric’s Empirical Analysis

840 F.2d 132 · 1988

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 50 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2024 · most notably Mack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (1989), Correa-Martinez v. Arrillaga-Belendez (1990)

28 federal appellate · 50 district · 2 state decisions

49019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Delaware State College v. Ricks · United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans · McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. · Mohasco Corp. v. Silver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); Miller v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 755 F.2d 20 , 23-24 (2d Cir.) (”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[t]he proper focus is upon the time of the discriminatory acts, not upon the time at which the consequences of the acts became most painful,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ ‘must allege that a discriminatory act occurred or that a discriminatory policy existed’ within the period prescribed by the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.