In re Impounded Case’s Empirical Analysis
840 F.2d 196 · 1988
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2013
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Andresen v. Maryland · Copeland v. United States · Weiss v. York Hospital
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts have consistently allowed searches of law offices when the attorneys involved were the targets of criminal investigations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Gutierrez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.