Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 840 F.2d 202 - Lyons v. U.S. Marshals

Lyons v. U.S. Marshals’s Empirical Analysis

840 F.2d 202 · 1988

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
June 2010
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2010 · most notably Sell v. United States (2003), Terrell v. Brewer (1991)

21 federal appellate · 4 district ·

2301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Equimark Commercial Finance Company v. C.I.T. Financial Services Corporation (Formerly Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation) · Republic Industries, Inc. v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund · Ray v. Robinson · Betz Laboratories, Inc. v. Hines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly and unambiguously violate statutory or constitutional rights”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if a federal prisoner seeks only money damages under Bivens for violation of his constitutional rights, exhaustion is not required”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.