Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 840 F.2d 339 - Brock v. Hendershott

Brock v. Hendershott’s Empirical Analysis

840 F.2d 339 · 1988

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc. (1992), Nieto v. Ecker (1988)

42 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

5301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1106 (§ 406 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on 485 F. Supp. 629 - Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank · Jacobsen v. Filler · Donovan v. Mercer · Wolfel v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) exercises any discretionary authority or discretionary control respecting.management of such plan or exercises any authority or control respecting management or disposition of its assets; (ii) renders investment advice for a fee or other compensation, direct or indirect, with respect to any moneys or other property of such plan, or has any discretionary authority or responsibility to do so; or (iii) has any discretionary authority or discretionary responsibility in the administration of such plan.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] nonfiduciary's knowledge of the breach can be inferred from surrounding circumstances raising a reasonable inference of knowledge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]his approach was carefully held not to be applicable to prisoners proceeding without counsel since they often have little choice in proceeding on their own behalf.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.