Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 840 F.2d 682 - Turgeon v. Victoria Station Inc.

Turgeon v. Victoria Station Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

840 F.2d 682 · 1988

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Dominguez v. Miller (1995), Stadium Management Corp Anheuser-Busch Inc v. Miller Stadium Management Corp Kms Patriots Lp (1990)

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 301 · 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Mason v. Integrity Insurance · King v. Stanton · United States v. Technical Knockout Graphics, Inc. · Southwest Aircraft Services, Inc. v. City of Long Beach · Four Seas Center, Ltd. v. Davres, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In bankruptcy proceedings, the rules of finality developed under the general grant of appellate jurisdiction provided in 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1982) are given a flexible reading.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[b]ankruptcy orders that determine and seriously affect substantive rights may cause irreparable harm to the losing party if a party must wait sometimes years until the end of the bankruptcy administration before taking an appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “certain proceedings in a bankruptcy case are so distinctive and conclusive either to the rights of individual parties or the ultimate outcome of the case that final decisions as to them should be appealable as of right.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.