Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 840 F.3d 1183 - Dutcher v. Matheson

Dutcher v. Matheson’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

2 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 9 · 12 U.S.C. § 92A · 12 U.S.C. § 93A · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1453 (§ 5 of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Ratzlaf et Ux United States · National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services · Hall v. Bellmon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] national bank acts in a fiduciary capacity in the state in which it accepts the fiduciary appointment, executes the documents that create the fiduciary relationship, and makes discretionary decisions regarding the investment or distribution of fiduciary assets.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “act ... [in a] fiduciary capacity in which State banks, trust companies, or other corporations which come into competition with national banks are permitted to act under the laws of the State in which the national bank is located.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the plain meaning of the statute is clear. A national bank is located in those places where it acts or conducts business. And it certainly acts as a trustee in the state in which it liquidates trust assets.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.