Wreal, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
840 F.3d 1244 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Yakus v. United States · University of Texas v. Camenisch · Ned L. Siegel, Georgette Sosa Douglas v. Theresa Lepore, Charles E. Burton · Citibank Na v. Citytrust · McDonald's Corporation v. Robertson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [he] has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) irreparable injury will be suffered unless the injunction issues; (3) the threatened injury to the movant outweighs whatever damage the proposed injunction may cause the opposing party; and (4) if issued, the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A district court abuses its discretion ... when it applies the incorrect legal standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.