Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 840 F.3d 1244 - Wreal, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Wreal, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2022

1 state decisions

10020162020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))

Relies on Yakus v. United States · University of Texas v. Camenisch · Ned L. Siegel, Georgette Sosa Douglas v. Theresa Lepore, Charles E. Burton · Citibank Na v. Citytrust · McDonald's Corporation v. Robertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) it has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) irreparable injury will be suffered unless the injunction issues; (3) the threatened injury to the movant outweighs whatever damage the proposed injunction may cause the opposing party; and (4) if issued, the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A delay in seeking a preliminary injunction of even only a few months-though not necessarily fatal-militates against a finding of irreparable harm. A preliminary injunction requires showing "imminent" irreparable harm. Indeed, the very idea of a preliminary injunction is premised on the need for speedy and urgent action to protect a plaintiff's right before a case can be resolved on its merits. For this reason, our sister circuits and district courts within this Circuit and elsewhere have found that a party's failure to act with speed or urgency in moving for a preliminary injunction necessarily undermines a finding of irreparable harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A preliminary injunction is an 'extraordinary and drastic remedy,' and [Plaintiff] bears the 'burden of persuasion' to clearly establish all four of these prerequisites.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.