Dingle v. Stevenson’s Empirical Analysis
840 F.3d 171 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. United States · United States v. Dominguez Benitez · Roper Superintendent Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons · United States v. Jackson · Miller v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not suggested that a substantive rule would stretch beyond the proscribed sentence to reopen guilty pleas with a different sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Malvo v. Mathena
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.