Culp v. Madigan’s Empirical Analysis
840 F.3d 400 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on District of Columbia v. Heller · McDonald v. City of Chicago · City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc. · Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland · Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he critical problem presented by the plaintiffs' demand-for which they offer no solution-is verification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Culp v. Raoul · Culp v. Madigan“Illinois (and, presumably, the substantially similar state as well) [would be] unable to obtain information about his possible criminal or mental problems in those states.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Culp v. Raoul“such certification would provide Illinois with more information than it can obtain about its own residents' out-of-state sojourns, which they admittedly cannot track.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Culp v. Raoul
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.