United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
840 F.3d 477 · 2016
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Taylor v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Doggett v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court reviews de novo the district court's determination that a defendant's prior conviction constitutes a violent felony under the ACCA.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Indiana law defines burglary as 'break[ing] and enter[ing] the building or structure of another person, with intent to commit a felony or theft in it.' " Id . (alteration in original) (quoting Ind. Code § 35-43-2-1 ). 2 And the Supreme Court has defined generic burglary as "an unlawful or unprivileged entry into, or remaining in, a building or other structure, with intent to commit a crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review the denial of a motion to suppress de novo but the underlying factual determinations for clear error, giving due weight to inferences drawn by law enforcement officials.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.