Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 840 F.3d 710 - Fish v. Kobach

Fish v. Kobach’s Empirical Analysis

840 F.3d 710 · 2016

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 12 U.S.C. § 5462 · 26 U.S.C. § 6065 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1395W (§ 1860d-14 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1436A (Use of Assisted Housing by Aliens Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 52 U.S.C. § 10303

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Buckley v. Valeo · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Elrod v. Burns

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[flour factors must be shown by the movant to obtain a preliminary injunction: (1) the movant is substantially likely to succeed on the merits; (2) the movant will suffer irreparable injury if the injunction is denied; (3) the movant’s threatened injury outweighs the injury the opposing party will suffer under the injunction; and (4) the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest. 15”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he movant 'must demonstrate a significant risk that he or she will experience harm that cannot be compensated after the fact by money damages.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “that the attestation requirement is insufficient for it to carry out its eligibility-assessment and registration duties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.