Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 840 NE2D 342 - Kelley v. Tanoos

Kelley v. Tanoos’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Peavler v. BD. OF COM'RS MONROE CTY. · Sumpter v. State · King Ex Rel. King v. Northeast Security, Inc. · Young v. State · Celebration Fireworks, Inc. v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I’m as convinced as the police are that Jay Kelley did it.” “Well, the issue with the polygraph is that he took it four times and failed it three times.” “It’s all circumstantial, but it all leads back to him.” “He — I could throw you on to some other people the police looked at through different things and all — all of a sudden all the things they were hearing — everything just started pointing to him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.