Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 840 P.2d 644 - State v. Shepherd

State v. Shepherd’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2026

8 state decisions

401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Schmerber v. State of California · Smith v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety · DeVooght v. State · 85 Okla. Crim. 153 - State v. Humphrey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the investigating officer only instructs that blood be drawn from the driver when the officer reasonably believes that under the circumstances, any delay necessary to secure a warrant may result in the loss of evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.