Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 840 So. 2d 1047 - King v. State

840 So. 2d 1047 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ring v. Arizona · Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin, Inc. v. Circle K Corp. · 831 So. 2d 143 - King v. Moore · 808 So. 2d 1237 - King v. State · Quince v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An order denying a motion pursuant to rule 2.160(g) is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.