¶1Because, as the state concedes, the trial judge should have excused a particular juror for cause, Chavers v. State, 827 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Polite v. State, 754 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), and the defendant properly preserved the error in accordance with Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 876, 118 S.Ct. 197, 139 L.Ed.2d 134 (1997); see Wilson v. State, 753 So.2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review denied, 773 So.2d 59 (Fla.2000), the judgment below is reversed for a new trial.
840 So. 2d 263
Miller v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 18, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-12-18
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2005
1 state decisions
Relies on Sutton v. United States · Fazon v. Brown · Trotter v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-12-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →