¶1We reverse the trial court’s determination that the husband’s disability policy was a marital asset subject to equitable distribution. See Hoffner v. Hoffner, 577 So.2d 703, 704 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Hanks v. Hanks, 553 So.2d 340, 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Bloch v. Bloch, 688 So.2d 945, 947 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). We affirm on all other issues. On remand, the sole issue for the circuit court is to increase the award of permanent alimony to the wife in light of the reclassification of the husband’s disability policy.
840 So. 2d 372
Swedlow v. Swedlow
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 17, 2003
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-03-17
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2014
3 state decisions
Relies on 553 So. 2d 340 - Hanks v. Hanks · 577 So. 2d 703 - Hoffner v. Hoffner · 688 So. 2d 945 - Bloch v. Bloch
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-03-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →