¶1Sandra Thomas seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her motion regarding restitution. Thomas alleged that she returned the property at issue, thereby satisfying the restitution component of her sentence. We accept the state’s concession that the case should be reversed and remanded for the evidentiary hearing necessary to resolve the issue. See Weinstein v. State, 745 So.2d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Musial v. State, 689 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).
840 So. 2d 449
Thomas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 26, 2003
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-03-26
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2010
7 state decisions
Relies on 745 So. 2d 1085 - Weinstein v. State · 689 So. 2d 1307 - Musial v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-03-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →