Parrish v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1 · David W. McKay v. Texas · Hernandez v. State · Utica Mutual Insurance v. Talley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The status of a delinquent attorney not being a member of the State Bar of Texas does not place him in the position of being “unlicensed to practice law in this State.” He only has to pay his dues (he does not vacate the office of Attomey-at-Law) to resume his status as a “practicing lawyer.” Such attorney does not have to again show his fitness or qualifications to practice law. He does not have to be readmitted to the practice. His competency as an attorney has not been diminished. He faces no future disbarment proceedings. He automatically resumes his status as an active member of the State Bar of Texas.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Henson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.