Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 841 A.2d 175 - State v. Roberts

State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · Powers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although a spoliation instruction is improper when 'the destruction was a matter of routine with no fraudulent intent,' it is appropriate when 'the act was intentional or intended to suppress the truth.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.