841 F. 2d 1130 - United States v. Nicholson

841 F2d 1130 United States v. Nicholson

841 F.2d 1130

Unpublished Disposition

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Nicholas Marcus NICHOLSON, Defendant-Appellant.

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

1

No. 87-5033.

2

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 7, 1987.
Decided March 2, 1988.

3

Before O'SCANNLAIN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and KING,* District Judge.

ORDER

4

The court finds that (1) the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the motion to sever; (2) the preindictment delay did not violate the fifth amendment; (3) the district court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted the color photographs; and (4) sufficient evidence supports conviction.

5

AFFIRMED.

*

The Honorable Samuel P. King, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation